AI agent orchestration tools
Our analysis
LangChain leads at 30%, followed by OpenAI Agents SDK at 24%. “Terminal Use” at 19% suggests many developers favor direct, lightweight orchestration over dedicated frameworks.
Question
Have you used any of the following tools for AI agent orchestration or agent frameworks in the past year? Do you want to use any of the following in the next 6 months?
- scale
- Optional
- v2026.1
Data
| Respondents | Percent | |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | 1,329 | 30.2% |
| OpenAI Agents SDK | 1,048 | 23.8% |
| Terminal Use | 832 | 18.9% |
| LangGraph | 825 | 18.8% |
| Llama Stack | 767 | 17.4% |
| Google ADK | 617 | 14.0% |
| Hermes Agent | 449 | 10.2% |
| Vercel AI SDK | 395 | 9.0% |
| Pydantic AI | 390 | 8.9% |
| CrewAI | 242 | 5.5% |
| Semantic Kernel | 218 | 5.0% |
| AutoGen | 200 | 4.5% |
| Strands | 178 | 4.0% |
| DSPy | 159 | 3.6% |
| Mastra | 132 | 3.0% |
| Dify | 126 | 2.9% |
| Smolagents | 116 | 2.6% |
| Atomic Agents | 115 | 2.6% |
| Instructor | 106 | 2.4% |
| Agno | 105 | 2.4% |
| 21st.dev | 100 | 2.3% |
| GripTape | 91 | 2.1% |
Use this data
Response data is released under the ODbL 1.0, which asks that you attribute it.
Structured for code, with the question, the year and the source url alongside the numbers.
A formatted table, ready to paste into a document, an issue or a prompt.
Spreadsheet
.csv is a plain text format which most spreadsheet software can open.