Did you switch AI tools in the past year?
Our analysis
Two-thirds switched tools during the year. Output quality is the largest reason at 25%, well ahead of integration (7%), cost (6%), security (2%), or model access (2%).
Question
In the past year, have you switched from one AI tool to another for work? If yes, what was the primary reason?
- single select
- Optional
- v2026.1
Data
| Respondents | Percent | |
|---|---|---|
| No | 4,423 | 33.7% |
| Yes — better output quality | 3,305 | 25.1% |
| Yes — my organization required or recommended a different tool | 1,394 | 10.6% |
| Yes — better integration with my workflow or development environment | 975 | 7.4% |
| Yes — lower cost | 835 | 6.4% |
| Yes — better support for agents, automation, or coding workflows | 487 | 3.7% |
| Yes — another reason (write in) | 466 | 3.6% |
| Yes — the previous tool became too expensive, limited, or unavailable | 433 | 3.3% |
| Yes — better security, privacy, or compliance | 283 | 2.2% |
| Yes — access to a preferred model or provider | 280 | 2.1% |
| Yes — for a specific feature | 179 | 1.4% |
| Not applicable — I do not use AI tools for work | 84 | 0.6% |
Use this data
Response data is released under the ODbL 1.0, which asks that you attribute it.
Structured for code, with the question, the year and the source url alongside the numbers.
A formatted table, ready to paste into a document, an issue or a prompt.
Spreadsheet
.csv is a plain text format which most spreadsheet software can open.