Skip to content
Stack Overflow Dev Survey 2026

LLMs

Our analysis

75% have used Anthropic LLMs in the last year, and 61% want to keep using them; 74% have used OpenAI LLMs, 42% want to keep using them.
LLMsAll Respondents · n = 11,895 · Desired = "Want to use" / Admired = "Have used" & "Want to use"All RespondentsLLMsDesiredAdmiredAnthropic49%61%OpenAI32%42%Google AI26%45%DeepSeek13%44%Microsoft10%33%Mistral AI9%44%Alibaba Qwen9%53%Moonshot AI5%58%xAI4%37%Meta AI3%26%Zhipu AI3%65%Snowflake2%35%Databricks (DBRX)2%37%Black Forest Labs1%54%Cohere1%38%Voyage AI (MongoDB)<1%39%Stability AI<1%36%01.AI<1%46%Cascade<1%42%Luel<1%49%Guide Labs<1%54%Reka<1%49%Minimax<1%69%GLM<1%50%11,895Desired = "Want to use" / Admired = "Have used" & "…Data licensed under Open Database License (ODbL) 1.0
All Respondents · n = 11,895 · Desired = "Want to use" / Admired = "Have used" & "Want to use"
Download this chart
Format

Question

Which LLM model vendors for AI tools have you used for work in the past year? Which would you like to use next year? Select all that apply.
  • scale
  • Optional
  • v2026.1

Data

DesiredAdmired
Anthropic49.1%60.5%
OpenAI32.2%41.5%
Google AI26.3%44.5%
DeepSeek12.8%43.6%
Microsoft9.7%32.6%
Mistral AI8.9%43.7%
Alibaba Qwen8.5%52.5%
Moonshot AI4.5%58.2%
xAI4.4%37.2%
Meta AI2.8%26.0%
Zhipu AI2.5%64.6%
Snowflake1.8%35.0%
Databricks (DBRX)1.6%37.1%
Black Forest Labs1.4%54.2%
Cohere1.1%37.5%
Voyage AI (MongoDB)0.9%39.1%
Stability AI0.8%36.3%
01.AI0.7%46.4%
Cascade0.7%41.5%
Luel0.7%48.8%
Guide Labs0.6%53.8%
Reka0.5%48.7%
Minimax0.1%69.2%
GLM0.1%50.0%

Use this data

The Markdown table shows one column per segment; the CSV and JSON carry every measure.

Response data is released under the ODbL 1.0, which asks that you attribute it.

Structured for code, with the question, the year and the source url alongside the numbers.

A formatted table, ready to paste into a document, an issue or a prompt.

Spreadsheet

.csv is a plain text format which most spreadsheet software can open.