Skip to content
Stack Overflow Dev Survey 2026

Knowledge Data

What does everyone need to know? In software development, context seems to be the reigning king this year, whether or not AI agents are involved. But the right context is not always reaching developers at the right time.

5.1 Context Challenges

Time spent finding information

75% spend 5 or more hours/week searching for information; 11% spend 20+ hours

Question

In a typical week, how much time do you spend looking for information you need to do your work?  Please provide a whole number representing hours per week, rounding up to the nearest whole number if needed.
All Respondents · n = 12,0060%5%10%15%20%135791113151719212325272932353840434812,006
RespondentsPercent
13162.6%
27996.7%
37476.2%
41,1719.8%
51,93516.1%
66435.4%
72161.8%
81,25510.5%
9470.4%
102,11917.6%
1150.0%
122662.2%
13100.1%
14460.4%
158326.9%
162031.7%
1760.0%
18430.4%
1910.0%
208487.1%
21100.1%
2240.0%
2350.0%
24450.4%
251191.0%
2630.0%
2710.0%
28110.1%
2910.0%
301251.0%
32110.1%
3310.0%
35160.1%
3610.0%
3870.1%
3930.0%
40460.4%
4260.0%
4310.0%
4540.0%
4860.0%
50+720.6%
All Respondents · n = 12,006 View and share

Important project context

Project goals (85%) and code/technical docs (73%) are the most needed context types.

Question

When working on a project or task, which types of context are most important for you to have? Select up to 5.
All Respondents · n = 12,678Project goals85%Code and documentation73%Prior decisions44%Related tickets37%Business goals33%Pull requests and history26%User feedback26%Team ways of working25%Compliance and policy20%Status or ownership20%Past discussions16%Data and dashboards7%Don't need more context2%Other1%12,678
RespondentsPercent
Project goals or requirements10,80685.2%
Code, repositories, or technical documentation9,29773.3%
Prior decisions and rationale5,58044.0%
Related tickets, tasks, or issues4,67936.9%
Business goals or product strategy4,18933.0%
Pull requests, commit history, or release notes3,33226.3%
Customer or user feedback3,29626.0%
Team norms, preferences, or ways of working3,18325.1%
Compliance, security, or policy requirements2,49819.7%
Current status or ownership2,49019.6%
Past discussions in chat, email, or meetings2,00015.8%
Data, dashboards, or reports9327.4%
I do not usually need additional context2662.1%
Other790.6%
All Respondents · n = 12,678 View and share

Barriers to finding context

Incomplete info (63%), knowledge in people's heads (61%), and outdated info (56%) are top barriers.

Question

Which of the following make it difficult to get the context you need for work? Select all that apply.
All Respondents · n = 12,374Incomplete information63%Context in people’s heads61%Information is outdated56%Across too many tools53%Don't know where to look31%Decisions are hard to find26%Teams disagree on the truth25%Search isn't useful23%AI lacks enough context20%No authoritative source18%AI uses the wrong context17%Blocked by permissions16%Usually have what I need10%Limit context deliberately6%Not applicable2%Other2%12,374
RespondentsPercent
Information is incomplete7,82563.2%
Important context lives in people’s heads7,54160.9%
Information is outdated6,98956.5%
Information is spread across too many tools6,60353.4%
I do not know where to look3,81630.8%
Important decisions are hard to find later3,22626.1%
Different teams have different versions of the truth3,14425.4%
Search does not return useful results2,88123.3%
AI tools do not have enough context2,47120.0%
I do not know which source is authoritative2,27218.4%
AI tools use the wrong context2,07516.8%
Access or permissions prevent me from seeing what I need1,96115.8%
I usually have the context I need1,1939.6%
I intentionally limit context because of privacy or security concerns7536.1%
Not applicable2912.4%
Other1931.6%
All Respondents · n = 12,374 View and share

Managing work context

Context management is highly manual — keeping separate notes (54%) and starting fresh AI sessions (45%) dominate.

Question

Which of the following do you do to manage or prepare context for your work? Select all that apply.
All Respondents · n = 12,039Notes in separate doc54%Personal notes54%Start a new chat to reset45%Team documentation43%Ask teammates38%Manually pick files for AI35%Search multiple tools33%Copy/paste between tools33%Reuse saved prompts16%Limit what I share10%Nothing specific7%Other2%12,039
RespondentsPercent
Keep notes or prompts in a separate document6,49553.9%
Maintain personal documentation or notes6,48253.8%
Start new AI chats or sessions to reset context5,41545.0%
Maintain team documentation or wikis5,17843.0%
Ask teammates where to find information4,57238.0%
Manually select files or documents for AI tools4,17434.7%
Search across multiple tools3,99333.2%
Copy and paste information between tools3,93932.7%
Reuse saved prompts or templates1,89215.7%
Limit the context I share because of privacy/security concerns1,19810.0%
I do not do anything specific to manage context8296.9%
Other1991.7%
All Respondents · n = 12,039 View and share

Discovering context too late

79% discover important context only after starting a task, highlighting systemic context gaps.

Question

How often do you discover important work context only after you have already started or completed a task?
All Respondents · n = 12,687Very often12%Often23%Sometimes43%Rarely17%Never1%Not sure2%Not applicable2%12,687
RespondentsPercent
Very often1,53912.1%
Often2,96423.4%
Sometimes5,46543.1%
Rarely2,13616.8%
Never1301.0%
Not sure2532.0%
Not applicable2001.6%
All Respondents · n = 12,687 View and share

5.2 Knowledge sources and trust

Sources for work-related answers

Coworkers (72%) and code repos (63%) are the go-to sources — internal beats external.

Question

When you need to answer a work-related question, which sources do you use most often? Select up to 5.
All Respondents · n = 14,462Coworkers or teammates72%Code and comments63%Internal docs and wikis60%Internal chat tools45%Official docs31%Product and API docs29%Stack Overflow24%Manager or leadership23%Ticketing tools20%Past decisions16%Meeting notes11%Other7%Vendor forum3%Customer and sales info3%Not sure1%None of these1%14,462
RespondentsPercent
Coworkers or teammates10,40571.9%
Code repositories or code comments9,06562.7%
Internal documentation (i.e. Design, product, or planning docs), wiki, or knowledge base8,68760.1%
Internal chat tools, such as Slack or Teams6,57245.4%
Official docs4,41530.5%
Product, vendor, or API documentation4,22129.2%
Stack Overflow3,47224.0%
Manager or leadership3,27222.6%
Project management or ticketing tools2,91620.2%
Past decisions or architecture records2,24815.5%
Meeting notes or transcripts1,53610.6%
Other1,0087.0%
Vendor forum4112.8%
Customer, support, or sales information3622.5%
Not sure1961.4%
None of these1220.8%
All Respondents · n = 14,462 View and share

Importance of information accuracy

Accuracy is the expectation for official docs, API documentation, and code repos; chat tools and Stack Overflow face lower accuracy expectations.

Question

For each source, how important is it that information you use to operate is accurate?
All Respondents · n = 14,049ImportantLeast importantNot very importantSomewhat importantVery importantCode and comments28%6%65%Coworkers or teammates34%8%57%Customer and sales info29%17%51%Internal chat tools44%19%35%Internal docs and wikis36%12%51%Manager or leadership31%9%60%Meeting notes37%4%24%35%None of these14%9%5%16%55%Not sure17%9%5%26%43%Official docs22%5%73%Past decisions37%4%20%38%Product and API docs25%6%68%Ticketing tools41%15%41%Stack Overflow41%3%25%30%Vendor forum36%3%22%38%14,049
ImportantLeast importantNot very importantSomewhat importantVery important
Code repositories or code comments27.6%0.1%0.7%6.3%65.2%
Coworkers or teammates34.1%0.1%0.7%8.4%56.7%
Customer, support, or sales information28.9%0.9%2.6%17.1%50.6%
Internal chat tools, such as Slack or Teams43.8%0.3%2.3%18.6%35.0%
Internal documentation (i.e. Design, product, or planning docs), wiki, or knowledge base35.9%0.2%1.2%11.9%50.9%
Manager or leadership30.8%0.1%0.8%8.6%59.6%
Meeting notes or transcripts37.0%0.9%3.8%23.8%34.5%
None of these14.3%9.2%5.1%16.3%55.1%
Not sure17.4%9.4%4.7%25.5%43.0%
Official docs21.7%0.1%0.7%5.0%72.5%
Past decisions or architecture records37.4%0.2%3.7%20.3%38.4%
Product, vendor, or API documentation25.3%0.0%0.8%5.5%68.4%
Project management or ticketing tools41.2%0.4%2.0%15.2%41.2%
Stack Overflow40.9%0.7%3.4%25.0%30.0%
Vendor forum36.0%0.5%3.2%22.1%38.2%
All Respondents · n = 14,049 View and share

Importance of current information

Recency/timestamps matter most for official docs and product/vendor docs; people tolerate stale human knowledge.

Question

For each source, how important is it that information you use to operate is recent or clearly timestamped?
All Respondents · n = 13,678ImportantLeast importantNot very importantSomewhat importantVery importantCode and comments27%6%15%51%Coworkers or teammates30%4%12%23%30%Customer and sales info31%4%14%49%Internal chat tools34%7%21%36%Internal docs and wikis33%5%19%42%Manager or leadership31%3%9%20%36%Meeting notes33%6%16%43%None of these12%12%10%30%37%Not sure25%10%9%28%28%Official docs30%4%13%52%Past decisions31%8%24%35%Product and API docs31%4%13%51%Ticketing tools34%4%17%45%Stack Overflow33%9%22%34%Vendor forum30%7%20%43%13,678
ImportantLeast importantNot very importantSomewhat importantVery important
Code repositories or code comments27.1%1.8%6.0%14.6%50.5%
Coworkers or teammates30.3%4.4%11.7%23.4%30.1%
Customer, support, or sales information31.1%1.2%4.4%14.4%49.0%
Internal chat tools, such as Slack or Teams34.1%1.7%7.3%21.2%35.8%
Internal documentation (i.e. Design, product, or planning docs), wiki, or knowledge base33.2%1.0%5.2%18.6%41.9%
Manager or leadership31.4%3.3%9.1%20.2%36.1%
Meeting notes or transcripts33.1%1.4%6.1%16.3%43.1%
None of these11.8%11.8%9.7%30.1%36.6%
Not sure25.0%10.4%9.0%27.8%27.8%
Official docs29.8%1.0%3.9%13.2%52.0%
Past decisions or architecture records30.8%1.9%8.3%23.6%35.4%
Product, vendor, or API documentation31.3%0.9%3.6%12.9%51.2%
Project management or ticketing tools33.6%1.0%4.2%16.8%44.5%
Stack Overflow33.3%2.3%8.5%22.2%33.7%
Vendor forum29.5%1.0%6.5%20.2%42.8%
All Respondents · n = 13,678 View and share

Importance of source traceability

Source traceability is most critical for code repos and customer support docs; coworker knowledge is trusted by reputation.

Question

For each source you selected, how important is it that you can quickly check where the information came from before relying on it for work? By “check where the information came from,” we mean being able to quickly open or review the original source, context, citation, document, message, ticket, dashboard, or person behind the information.
All Respondents · n = 13,214ImportantLeast importantNot very importantSomewhat importantVery importantCode and comments30%6%14%48%Coworkers or teammates29%4%15%25%27%Customer and sales info31%3%7%15%44%Internal chat tools34%10%23%32%Internal docs and wikis33%9%20%37%Manager or leadership28%5%14%22%31%Meeting notes35%3%8%21%34%None of these14%10%12%28%36%Not sure30%13%4%28%25%Official docs27%5%10%15%44%Past decisions34%6%22%37%Product and API docs28%4%9%16%43%Ticketing tools37%5%18%39%Stack Overflow36%9%21%33%Vendor forum33%3%6%21%37%13,214
ImportantLeast importantNot very importantSomewhat importantVery important
Code repositories or code comments29.9%1.7%5.8%14.4%48.1%
Coworkers or teammates29.4%4.4%14.9%24.6%26.8%
Customer, support, or sales information31.4%3.0%6.7%14.6%44.2%
Internal chat tools, such as Slack or Teams33.8%2.3%9.5%22.9%31.5%
Internal documentation (i.e. Design, product, or planning docs), wiki, or knowledge base32.5%1.8%9.2%19.7%36.8%
Manager or leadership28.4%4.5%14.0%22.3%30.8%
Meeting notes or transcripts34.6%3.1%7.5%20.5%34.4%
None of these13.5%10.1%12.4%28.1%36.0%
Not sure30.0%12.9%4.3%27.9%25.0%
Official docs26.8%4.8%10.0%14.7%43.7%
Past decisions or architecture records33.7%1.8%6.2%21.8%36.5%
Product, vendor, or API documentation27.7%3.7%9.1%16.2%43.4%
Project management or ticketing tools36.7%1.8%5.4%17.5%38.5%
Stack Overflow35.5%2.4%8.7%20.7%32.7%
Vendor forum32.9%3.1%6.2%20.5%37.3%
All Respondents · n = 13,214 View and share

Source attribution for AI answers

79% consider source attribution important or very important for trusting AI answers.

Question

How important is source attribution when deciding whether to trust an AI-generated technical answer?
All Respondents · n = 13,945Very important52%Important27%Somewhat important14%Not very important5%Least important2%13,945
RespondentsPercent
Very important7,26952.1%
Important3,70126.5%
Somewhat important1,95614.0%
Not very important7535.4%
Least important2661.9%
All Respondents · n = 13,945 View and share

Signals of trustworthy information

Recency (72.6%) and authority (60%) beat attribution and peer validation as trust signals.

Question

When deciding whether to rely on work-related information, which signals matter most to you? Select up to 5.
All Respondents · n = 12,996It is up to date73%From a trusted source60%Matches other sources46%Clear and complete43%I know who owns it38%Includes sources38%Marked final or approved31%My team endorses it25%Reviewed by an expert24%Not draft or outdated18%Respects access rules9%Not sure3%None of these1%12,996
RespondentsPercent
It is recent or clearly up to date9,43572.6%
It comes from an official or trusted source7,79960.0%
It is consistent with other trusted information5,96745.9%
It is clear, complete, and easy to understand5,54042.6%
I know who created or owns it4,94638.1%
It includes sources, citations, links, or supporting evidence4,88737.6%
It is marked final, approved, accepted, or official3,96030.5%
Other people on my team use or endorse it3,21224.7%
It was reviewed or validated by a subject matter expert3,16124.3%
It is not marked draft, outdated, deprecated, or superseded2,28117.6%
It respects access, privacy, or permission rules1,1699.0%
Not sure4113.2%
None of these1150.9%
All Respondents · n = 12,996 View and share

5.3 AI adoption and cost

Tasks delegated to AI agents

Code tasks dominate AI use (73% write code, 62% debug); critical ops like deploying (10%) are rarely delegated.

Question

For each job function, which tasks have you delegated to an AI tool or agent in the last 30 days?
All Respondents · n = 13,756Writing code73%Debugging62%Tests51%Documentation48%Code review45%Design and architecture26%Incidents and outages26%Planning and estimating25%Answering questions21%Data and metrics20%Onboarding to new thing20%Security and compliance20%Changing production19%Maintaining dependencies19%None of the above16%Monitoring and alerts14%Deploying and releasing10%Coordinating across teams6%13,756
RespondentsPercent
Writing, editing, or generating code10,02772.9%
Debugging or troubleshooting8,55262.2%
Writing or maintaining tests6,96050.6%
Writing or updating documentation6,64248.3%
Reviewing code, pull requests, or technical changes6,18244.9%
Making technical design or architecture decisions3,62926.4%
Investigating an incident, outage, or production issue3,56025.9%
Planning, scoping, or estimating work3,46125.2%
Answering questions from teammates, customers, users, or stakeholders2,94121.4%
Analyzing data, reports, or business metrics2,77320.2%
Onboarding to a new project, tool, system, or codebase2,70619.7%
Finding or fixing security, privacy, or compliance issues2,67619.5%
Changing production code, systems, or infrastructure2,60118.9%
Maintaining dependencies, packages, or development environments2,54718.5%
None of the above2,25516.4%
Monitoring systems, logs, metrics, or alerts1,86413.6%
Deploying or releasing software1,3469.8%
Coordinating work across teams or functions7745.6%
All Respondents · n = 13,756 View and share

Control over information used by AI

64% actively curate what info AI uses; 17% have little or no visibility into AI inputs.

Question

When using AI tools or agents for work, how much control do you usually have over the work information they use?
All Respondents · n = 13,243I decide exactly45%I pick from what's there19%Don't use AI for work13%The tool chooses10%Not sure what it uses6%Someone else manages it6%13,243
RespondentsPercent
I decide exactly what information to give the AI tool5,92844.8%
I choose from available sources, files, or systems2,54919.3%
I do not use AI tools or agents for work1,75113.2%
The AI tool chooses the information automatically1,37410.4%
I am not sure what information the AI tool uses8306.3%
Someone else manages what information the AI tool can access8116.1%
All Respondents · n = 13,243 View and share

Factors in AI adoption

Output quality, security, and price drive adoption — organizations are pragmatic and risk-averse.

Question

When you or your organization decides whether to adopt, continue using, or expand use of an AI tool or model for your work, which factors matter most? Select up to 3.
All Respondents · n = 11,462Useful, accurate results31%Security & privacy29%Price matches the value27%Legal & compliance22%Not sure22%Company policy allows it16%Teams are asking for it13%Signs of better outcomes13%Less reworking of outputs12%Worth paying more for10%Spending is easy to limit10%Fits how people work9%Connects to existing sys.7%Switch without disruption6%Oversight is manageable6%Other3%Review burden is low3%Observability is built in2%11,462
RespondentsPercent
The tool produces useful and accurate results3,52030.7%
The tool meets security, privacy requirements3,29028.7%
The price is acceptable for the value it provides3,09027.0%
The tool meets legal or compliance requirements2,55722.3%
Not sure2,52222.0%
Your company policy allows for usage1,84416.1%
Employees or teams are asking to use it1,45112.7%
There is evidence that the tool improves business outcomes1,44612.6%
The tool reduces time spent correcting, retrying, or reworking outputs1,40112.2%
The tool is worth paying more for because of better results1,1379.9%
Usage and spending are easy to monitor or limit1,0899.5%
The tool works well with how people already do their jobs1,0559.2%
The tool connects with systems people already use7676.7%
The organization can switch tools or models without major disruption6655.8%
Human oversight is manageable6635.8%
Other3683.2%
Review burden is low3202.8%
The tool has observability already integrated or built in2131.9%
All Respondents · n = 11,462 View and share

Organizational AI usage practices

38% of orgs set AI spending limits; 18% have no formal governance.

Question

Which, if any, of the following has your organization done related to AI tool or model usage? Select all that apply.
All Respondents · n = 11,468Limited usage or spending38%Reviewed usage data28%Different tools per task27%Limited who can use them25%Results justified spend21%Not sure18%None of the above18%Compared buying vs building11%Cut other tools to fund AI9%Negotiated shorter terms3%11,468
RespondentsPercent
Set limits on AI tool or model usage or spending4,36738.1%
Reviewed internal usage or spending data for AI tools or models3,24028.3%
Approved different AI tools or models for different types of work3,12227.2%
Set limits on who can use certain AI tools or models2,90125.3%
Increased spending on AI tools or models because results justified it2,36620.6%
Not sure2,04317.8%
None of the above2,03017.7%
Compared buying an AI tool with building something internally1,29011.2%
Stopped using or reduced spending on other software tools while increasing investment in AI tools or models9928.7%
Negotiated shorter commitments or the ability to switch AI tools or models over time3643.2%
All Respondents · n = 11,468 View and share

AI cost and usage limits

33% self-monitor AI usage; cost pressure changes model selection and task selectivity.

Question

Has cost or usage limits ever changed how you personally use AI tools at work?
All Respondents · n = 1,033I monitor my own use33%I choose cheaper models25%Usage is metered24%No, cost hasn't affected me22%Haven't hit any limits21%More selective about tasks17%Budget was increased13%Not sure11%Yes, switched to cheaper7%Faster models, higher cost5%1,033
RespondentsPercent
Yes, I personally monitor my own use33732.6%
Yes, I choose cheaper models when possible26125.3%
Yes, usage is metered to manage costs24623.8%
No, cost/limits have not affected my usage23122.4%
I have not encountered cost or usage limits21320.6%
Yes, I am more selective about tasks17116.6%
My company/team has increased budget for AI13212.8%
Not sure11711.3%
Yes, my company/team has switched models/vendors that are more affordable716.9%
Yes, I choose faster models even when they cost more514.9%
All Respondents · n = 1,033 View and share
See the Knowledge highlights

What’s next?